Article 35A LIVE: Supreme Court Adjourns Hearing, CJI Says Only 3-Judge Bench Can Decide Matter
Article 35A LIVE: Supreme Court Adjourns Hearing, CJI Says Only 3-Judge Bench Can Decide Matter
The crucial hearing on petitions challenging validity of Article 35A was adjourned as Justice D Y Chandrachud, one of three judges in bench, was not present.

The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned the hearing on pleas challenging Constitutional validity of Article 35A pertaining to Jammu and Kashmir. Petitions on Article 35 A will now be heard in week commencing August 27, said Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra. The crucial hearing was adjourned as Justice D Y Chandrachud, one of three judges in bench, was not present. The matter was initially listed for hearing before a bench comprising CJI and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud. The three-judge bench was hearing the case to decide whether issue of Article 35A has to be referred to constitutional bench. “We will only have to see whether Article 35 A goes against basic structure of Constitution,” the Supreme Court said. Article 35A, which was incorporated in the Constitution by a 1954 Presidential Order, accords special rights and privileges to the citizens of Jammu and Kashmir and denies property rights to a woman who marries a person from outside the state. The provision, which leads such women from the state to forfeit their right over property, also applies to their heirs.

Stay tuned for LIVE updates:

Read all the Latest News , Breaking News , watch Top Videos and Live TV here.

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://umatno.info/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!