views
FRANKFURT European Central Bank policymakers debated last month the extent of their flexibility in conducting emergency bond purchases as part of unprecedented efforts to revive the euro zone economy, the accounts of their July meeting showed on Thursday.
The ECB left policy unchanged last month and provided a slightly more optimistic view on growth but said it is still likely to use up all of its already-approved stimulus firepower to tackle the biggest economic collapse in living memory.
But the account of the meeting suggests some policymakers are not keen for another increase in the ECB’s 1.35 trillion euro pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP).
“The argument was also made that the flexibility of the PEPP suggested that the net purchase envelope should be considered a ceiling rather than a target,” said the accounts of the July 16 policy meeting published by the ECB.
The formulation in the accounts suggest that this was a minority view, however, with other members of the Governing Council backing a more liberal interpretation of flexibility given unprecedented uncertainty.
“Under the baseline scenario …the current presumption was that the PEPP envelope would have to be used in full,” the accounts showed.
With the euro zone economy expected to shrink by around a tenth this year because of the coronavirus pandemic, the ECB is buying record amounts of debt to help governments cope with extra spending. It is also paying banks to lend out its cash in an effort to salvage viable companies.
Economic data over the summer suggests that a recovery is well underway and may even be quicker than some had hoped, but rising infection numbers are raising fears that further restrictive measures may be needed to contain the pandemic.
Some government subsidy schemes, aimed at supporting jobs, are also due to run out over the next few months, suggesting that unemployment is now artificially low and will tick higher, weighing on the recovery.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor
Comments
0 comment