New Delhi: Google India, which along with 20 websites is facing criminal case for allegedly hosting objectionable materials, on Monday told the Delhi High Court that blocking them was not an option as a democratic India does not have a "totalitarian" regime like China.
"The issue relates to a constitutional issue of freedom of speech and expression and suppressing it was not possible as the right to freedom of speech in democratic India separates us from a totalitarian regime like China," advocate N K Kaul, appearing for Google India, told Justice Suresh Kait.
During last hearing, Justice Kait had warned Google India and social networking site Facebook India that websites can be "blocked" like in China if they fail to devise a mechanism to check and remove objectionable material from their web pages.
Responding to the court's remark, Kaul referred to media reports on the issue saying "they (reports) suggest the existence of the right (freedom of speech)."
Initiating arguments, Kaul said internet is a global system having billions of users that also included companies, private persons and the governments and their departments.
He filed a representation in the court and said an online search for a word like "virgin" has 82.30 crore search results within 0.33 seconds and the idea of blocking a word like this would deprive net-users of the required information.
"The queries could relate to Virgin Airlines or for that matter 'virgin areas for inventions'," he said.
Seeking quashing of the summons issued against the firm by a lower court, he said "Google India is neither a search engine nor a web hosting site and is a distinct legal entity from its US-based holding company Google Inc, a search engine."
"No criminal liability can be fastened on Google India," he said.
Comments
0 comment